Brand News

Consumers in emerging markets like U.S. brands, yet

Brandweek reports here about a 2006 study from Synovate, Chicago, in which more than 13,000 consumers in 20 countries were quizzed online, via phone or in person about their brand preferences across a host of categories.

“Branded international products are a mark of quality,” said Mike Sherman, executive director of customer insights for Synovate Asia, Hong Kong. “Even low-income consumers will pay a premium for a well-made, branded product.”

While 60% of respondents in emerging markets said they’d buy local products if they were the same price as an international offering, consumers often named brands like Avon, Coca-Cola and McDonald’s as their preferred choice.

China, the premier emerging market, has a taste for not only Bud, but also Coke and Kentucky Fried Chicken. Safeguard soap is also very popular, as are Sony TVs. Adidas, Armani, Chivas Regal, Lipton, Maybelline, Shell and 7-Eleven are among the brands with more Western appeal to appear among the Chinese most-preferred brands. “While some households in China’s rural cities pull in as little as $600 per year, they may still have a state-of-the-art cell phone. Their cost of living is very low so they have the disposable income. They are savvy consumers”, said Sherman.
Being able to purchase these brands equates success. They are aspirational. Where they’re coming from, they’ve hit the big time when they purchase these brands. For some, it’s not just the quality, it’s a symbol of achieving the highest level of lifestyle success.

Wie groß ist der Markt für Auto Lizenzprodukte?

Nach einer Studie von Research & Markets, die von The Autochannel publiziert wird, erreichte der Markt für unter Automarken lizenzierten Produkten in 2005 ein Volumen von 5,1 Milliarden US Dollar.
Die Marken von General Motors, Ford und DaimlerChrysler stehen für 80% davon.
Allein diese drei großen Hersteller haben über 1.200 Lizenznehmer.

Die folgenden Produktkategorien dominieren bei den Lizenzprodukten:

Spielzeug
Videospiele
Bekleidung und Accessoires
Zubehör
Sammelobjekte

Car Brands – How big is the market for licensed goods?

According to a study by Research & Markets published by The Autochannel the global market for sales of licensed branded car merchandise reached $5.1 Billion in 2005.

The brands of General Motors, Ford and DaimlerChrysler are accounting for 80% of this worldwide market.

There are more than 1,200 licensees for the Big 3 alone.

Automotive licensing is dominated by the following categories:

  • toys
  • videogames
  • apparel and accessories
  • auto accessories
  • collectibles

Marken Power

WWD berichtet über eine monatliche Auswertung, wie oft Modemarken in Suchmaschinen eingegeben werden. Hier sind die Power Marken des Monats Februar:

LOUIS VUITTON
Volumen: 315,126

NIKE
Volumen: 252,875

ADIDAS
Volumen: 158,656

GUCCI
Volumen: 154,237

CHANEL
Volumen: 147,716

SPEEDO
Volumen: 137,236

PRADA
Volumen: 119,895

JUICY COUTURE
Volumen: 113,835

UGG BOOTS
Volumen: 112,280

THE NORTH FACE
Volumen: 112,100

CONVERSE
Volumen: 99,438

GUESS
Volumen: 97,621

Sears preparing for IP financing

Businessweek reports here that Sears has quietly created $1.8 billion in securities based on its brands Kenmore, Craftsman, and DieHard.

Sears is on the cutting edge of a financial innovation so important that it could unlock trillions of dollars in capital across Corporate America and change the way managers of a wide range of businesses think about their balance sheets.

Sears has created $1.8 billion worth of securities based on the brand names Kenmore, Craftsman, and DieHard. In essence, it has transferred ownership of the brands to another entity, which it then pays for the right to use the brands. The deal, carried off last May, was the biggest “securitization” of intellectual property in history, according to Eric Hedman, an analyst at Standard & Poor’s (MHP ), which, like BusinessWeek, is a unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies. (MHP ) The story hasn’t gotten out until now because the bonds haven’t actually changed hands—Sears is holding them in its Bermuda-based insurance subsidiary—and because Sears has never disclosed them, nor has it had to do so. But that could change if Sears were to decide to sell them to outside investors and collect the cash.

Now, Sears could be on the cusp of turning a much squishier asset, intellectual property, into actual cash. Don Davis, managing director and general counsel at Commercial Strategy, a Boston intellectual property consulting firm, says the potential for a market in bonds backed by intangible assets could be even bigger than the market for junk bonds, given that 70% to 80% of the total value of the stock market rests on intangibles such as intellectual property. “The scale is astounding,” he says.

Sears, through a spokesman, says the bonds’ only purpose is to provide liquidity in the coffers of its insurance subsidiary to offset any potential losses there. It also says Lampert had nothing to do with the transaction but was briefed on it. And it says Sears’ outstanding debt is small relative to the company’s total value and is less than the cash it has on hand.

Sears has, in essence, created licensing income from whole cloth. First it transferred ownership of the brand names into KCD. Now, KCD charges Sears royalty fees to license those brands and uses the royalties to pay the interest on the bonds. It has sold the bonds to the insurance subsidiary, where, like any other security on an insurer’s books, it serves as protection against future loss. The insurer, meanwhile, protects Sears from financial trouble—and because it’s a subsidiary, it does so at a lower cost than Sears could get from an outside party.

Intellectual property bonds got their start with an unlikely financier: David Bowie. The rock star floated $55 million worth in 1997, backed by 300 song titles, with the interest covered by royalty payments from the songs. Since then, some 30 other deals have been struck. Film studios have issued bonds backed by future revenue streams. Designers such as Bill Blass (NEXC ) and retailers such BCBG Max Azria Group Inc. have issued bonds backed by outside licensing fees. And restaurant chains such as Arby’s Restaurant Group (TRY ) have issued bonds against outside franchising fees.

Sears’ KCD deal is different in one important way: It didn’t involve preexisting royalty payments. The company created the payments in order to issue the bonds. Richard D. Rudder, a New York lawyer who specializes in securitization of intellectual property and consulted on the KCD deal, says it’s the first deal he has seen that hasn’t involved cash coming in from the outside. In filings, Sears has suggested it could potentially license the trademarks to other parties—for example, to another company to make a new line of Craftsman products—although it hasn’t done so yet.