Brand News

Pushing the Limits of Extensions

Brandchannel.com has an interesting article about brand and line extensions:

In the marketing world, the Tide proliferation is known as line extension, and similarly, if Tide started making washing machines, it would be called brand extension.

It’s estimated that as of 2004, six percent of all new products launched each year in the US are in fact brand or line extensions.

While the practice of extensions is classic, today’s brand extensions can leave one’s head spinning.

Many attribute the plethora of extensions to being a more cost-effective means to stay in the mind of the consumer. A variation on advertising without resorting to using the same message in every instance.

But with over 30 (and counting) Oreo extensions created over the years —not including the infamous Oreo Fun Barbie doll licensed to Mattel— just how relevant is the exposure, and is the consumer marketplace flat out oversaturated?

Is there too much out there?
There are plenty of opportunities and they are working, which is why more and more marketers are looking to brand extensions. Consumers find comfort in brands they’re familiar with—and are more comfortable with a new product from those brands.

Back in 1998, prior to Kraft’s acquisition of the beloved cookie brand, then-parent company Nabisco’s public relations department maintained that its core revenue was still derived from the Oreo cookie SKUs and that extensions were only a small segment of the revenue.

Fast forward to 2003, and the Wall Street Journal cited the ousting of Kraft’s co-chief executive Betsy Holden as the result of an “over-reliance on brand extending and lack of new products.” The company had not profited from a new-brand success since the launch of DiGiorno Rising Crust frozen pizza in the mid-1990s. In the same article, industry professionals observed that Kraft had perhaps become too good at building brands, completely forgetting to create new ones.

Nonetheless, brand and line extensions are considered across the industry to be a vital part of growing the brand, particularly a mature one.
Business consultants McKinsey & Company recommended to consumer product companies in 2004 to develop product categories that “others have shunned” as an effective means for profitable growth. In the world of extensions, the danger lies in going too far with the model.

Extensions via licensing is a trend that continues to increase in the new millennium accounting for US$ 172 billion of retail sales worldwide, according to the Licensing Industry Merchandisers’
Association (LIMA).

While licensing deals can be lucrative for both the licensee and licensor, they also have the ability to negatively impact a brand when there is a lack of creative and/or marketing management participation on the part of the licensing brand. If there isn’t one person who’s really controlling the quality of the product or the quality of the marketing and advertising, you can really hurt your brand and oversaturate the marketplace.

Top 10 categories of brand loyalty

WWD reports from a study by America’s research group:

Women covet their beauty brands.

Of the 10 products listed here, four are in personal care.

Female shoppers have a penchant for buying brand-name cosmetics, which translates to all beauty products, too, said Britt Beemer, chairman and founder of America’s Research Group.

The survey of 1,264 women who are primary household decision-makers also revealed that brand names matter even when it comes to daily sundries such as coffee or laundry product purchases.

1. Bath Soap

2. Health and beauty aids

3. Hair products

4. Soft Drinks

5. Mayonnaise

6. Laundry products

7. Hand and body lotion

8. Over-the-counter medicines/pain relievers

9. Coffee

10. Shoes

Kodak licensed Storage Products

KMP owns the exclusive global license to market CD-ROMs, DVDs, videotape and related media products under the Kodak brand name.

The company works to obtain the various products from manufacturers across the globe, according to Kodak’s minimum specifications, and then puts them on store shelves.

It has done so, with rapid success, by establishing and managing a wide network of sister companies and other distribution relationships from an office in the old button factory at 300 State St. in Rochester’s High Falls district.

Kodak decided to leave the business in connection with its historic transition from film to digital imaging, choosing instead a licensing arrangement with KMP that brings in a yearly royalty.

The name Kodak is powerful enough and so well-known around the world that it gives those products a leg up on competitors.

Top 10 Ad Icons of the Century

Adage reports:

Some of the best-loved ad images of the 20th century have names like Tony, Betty and Ronald. Others, like the Marlboro Man, may not be as beloved, but grew to have tremendous worldwide impact as an instant identifier of Philip Morris Co.’s Marlboro cigarettes.

From frozen vegetables to packaged cake mix, from fast food to automobile tires, these carefully
drawn characters are the personifications of businesses that began small but grew to become
dominant brands in their fields – thanks in large part to their famous icons.

Many of the most famous ad icons were the brainchild of one agency: Chicago-based Leo Burnett Co., which specialized in building brands through the use of enormously popular characters, including the most effective icon of all time, the Marlboro Man.

Advertising Age’s list of the Top 10 ad icons of the 20th century recognizes those images that have had the most powerful resonance in the marketplace. The criteria include effectiveness,
longevity, recognizability and cultural impact.

The Marlboro Man

Ronald McDonald

The Green Giant

Betty Crocker

The Energizer Bunny

The Pillsbury Doughboy

Aunt Jemima

The Michelin Man

Tony the Tiger

Elsie

Yurman’s Beauty Deal

WWD reports here:

Paul Blum, just seven months into the job as David Yurman’s chief executive officer, is already bringing a new whiff into the air.

In an effort to propel the $500 million brand into the next stage of growth, the 26-year-old
jewelry firm has inked a deal for its first fragrance.

Terms of the fragrance deal, which was signed Tuesday, were not disclosed. Ancillary products are also part of the contract.

“For the best product extensions, it’s important to have two things,” said Blum. “It needs to be an understandable evolution of the brand, which the consumer has an emotional relationship with, and there has to be a close relationship to the brand.”

It is too early to project sales, although the fragrance for the first 12 months will only be sold through Yurman’s existing distribution channels. That amounts to only hundreds of doors, and industry sources estimated that as a result sales of the fragrance in the first year would be about
$2 million to $3 million at retail.

The licensee also produces Thierry Mugler Parfums and Azzaro fragrances.